Discussion:
Light Falls in Gravitational Field and Disproves Einstein
(trop ancien pour répondre)
Pentcho Valev
2018-04-29 14:48:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies." http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristian/Courses/PHYS4480/4480-PROBLEMS/optics-gravit-lens_PPT.pdf

If so, Soldner (Newton) was right about bending of light. Einstein was wrong. Eddington was a cheat:

Loading Image...

The Pound-Rebka experiment

Loading Image...

confirmed Newton's variable speed of light - see the 4th paragraph here: http://virgo.lal.in2p3.fr/NPAC/relativite_fichiers/pound.pdf

Newton's variable speed of light is incompatible with gravitational time dilation. This means that the Pound-Rebka experiment falsified general relativity. Idiocy:

Loading Image...

Pentcho Valev
Pentcho Valev
2018-04-30 09:57:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That the speed of falling light varies like the speed of ordinary falling bodies is so obvious that many Einsteinians confirm the fact, explicitly or implicitly, and so unwittingly disprove Einstein's relativity:

"If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies."x http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristian/Courses/PHYS4480/4480-PROBLEMS/optics-gravit-lens_PPT.pdf

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys419/sp2011/lectures/Lecture13/L13r.html

Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs.html

Pentcho Valev

Loading...